Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Free Financial Advisor
The Free Financial Advisor
Business
Brandon Marcus

FORGOTTEN HISTORY: Retiring at 62 instead of 67 heres what five extra years could cost you - Caught on Camera

Retiring at 62 Instead of 67? Here's What Five Extra Years Could Cost You
Claiming Social Security at 62 instead of 67 can reduce monthly retirement benefits by 30% for people born in 1960 or later. Compare your estimated benefits, healthcare costs, and savings before choosing when to retire – Shutterstock

Retirement can start with a wonderful feeling: Monday morning arrives, and nobody expects you to be anywhere. There is just one catch. Leaving work at 62 instead of 67 can permanently shrink your Social Security checks, even if you have spent decades paying into the system.

For Americans born in 1960 or later, claiming Social Security at 62 instead of full retirement age at 67 reduces the monthly retirement benefit by 30%. That decision also means giving up five years of potential earnings and delaying the larger checks that could help cover expenses later in life. Yet waiting until 67 isn’t automatically the smartest choice for everyone. The real question involves more than the size of a monthly deposit. It involves how to pay for retirement, how long savings must last, and how much freedom those extra working years are worth.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.