Get all your news in one place.

100's of premium titles.
One app.

Start reading

Get all your news in one place.

100's of premium titles. One news app.

Start reading

YOU WONT BELIEVE: 5 | Mind Blowing Facts

Bridgerton season 3 episode 6 recap: Colin unearths the shocking truth

Bridgerton season 3 episode 6 sees Colin finally discover the truth about Lady Whistledown's identity.

WhatToWatch

“The bit where the sound starts going crazy… that’s all happening live”: Fred again.. and Anderson .Paak face off on the drums as they give a chaotic performance of new track, Places To Be

“It’s a real privilege for me to be able to jam with Anderson and hangout,” says Fred

MusicRadar

New Texans DL Denico Autry ready to ‘play ball’ regardless of position

Denico Autry might not have a full-time position in 2024 with the Houston Texans, but that doesn't seem to be a concern for him or DeMeco Ryans.

USA Today Sports Media Group

From analysis to the latest developments in health,
read the most diverse news in one place.

Can a commercial airplane do a barrel roll?

Pilots have been doing barrel rolls in small planes throughout the history of aviation. But has anyone ever attempted this maneuver in a commercial airliner?

LiveScience

Samuel Alito has an ethics problem

Legal experts say its time for the Supreme Court's ethics code to grow some teeth

Salon

"Vampire": How war poisons the blood

The TV adaptation returns with a visceral parable of the effect man's inhumanity has on our hearts

Salon

Ind vs Eng, 5th Test: It’s all up to England’s beleaguered batters to make a match of this as the Test heads for swift end

DHARAMSHALA: Are the pieces of the jigsaw now falling in place for India? Or will the elusive missing bits reshape the whole picture?

The Times of India

Read news from The Economist, FT, and more,
with one subscription

Stokes echoes Botham and offers brief respite on another tricky day in India

The England captain took a wicket with his first ball since July although India continued to dominate the fifth Test

The Guardian - UK

Why a "Patchwork" is Better than Being Uniformly Wrong: A Qualified Defense of Section 3 Federalism

The Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. Anderson is in part rooted in fears of divergent state decisions on election issues. But a patchwork of divergent state rulings isn't necessarily bad.

Reason

If Trump Prevails, How Will Section 3 Be Litigated On Or After January 20, 2025?

Even under the Trump v. Anderson per curiam opinion, Section 3 can be raised as a defense without the need for federal implementing legislation. But the Supreme Court may still avoid ruling on the merits.

Reason

Were There Last Minute Changes to Trump v. Anderson?

There are reasons to suspect the justices were wrangling over language up until the last minute.

Reason

Supreme Court Rules for Trump in Section 3 Disqualification Case

Today's unanimous per curiam Supreme Court decision in Trump v. Anderson overturns the Colorado Supreme Court ruling disqualifying Donald Trump from the presidency under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. It does so on the ground that Section 3 is not "self-executing." Thus, only Congress, through special legislation, has the…

Reason

The Modern Supreme Court Agrees With Chief Justice Chase: Trump Cannot Be Removed From The Presidential Ballot

From the outset of the litigation, Blackman & Tillman's argument was that Griffin's Case bars the relief sought by the Colorado voters.

Reason

A Response to John Mikhail on "Officers of the United States"—Part I

The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail has already been addressed by our scholarship. This evidence was not "ignored or overlooked."

Reason

Get all your
news in one place.

100's of premium titles.
One news app.

Reason

New Thoughts On The Timing In The Section 3 And Criminal Immunity Cases.

If the Court kicks the insurrection issue to the election, the Court may also kick the immunity case to the election.

Reason

Blackman & Baude & Paulsen at San Diego Originalism Works-in-Progress Conference

"Some more scholars" talk about Section 3

Reason

Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part IV: Justice Sotomayor and Kagan get the line between national power and federalism

The states do not need Section 3 to impose qualifications on state-created positions. But only the national government should decide questions about the President.

Reason

Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin's Case and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts

Why did Jonathan Mitchell not vigorously defend Griffin's Case and Chief Justice Chase? And Mitchell missed Justice Barrett's question about direct/collateral challenges due to his refusal to accept the sword-shield dichotomy.

Get all your
news in one place.

100's of premium titles.
One news app.

Reason

Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets "Office under the United States"

Justice Jackson explained that an ambiguous text should be interpreted in favor of expanding democracy. But Mitchell's concern about Foreign Emoluments Clause "boomerang" could have cut off a path of complete victory.

Reason

Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part I: Justice Gorsuch Gets "Officers of the United States"

Justice Gorsuch demonstrates that he is the Court's most careful, consistent textualist.

Reason

While Attention Was on Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson, the Supreme Court Issued Two Opinions

Things you may have missed between the Trump disqualification case, Biden special counsel report, and NBA trade deadline.

The Guardian - US

US supreme court justices have strange views on whether Trump is disqualified

The justices, wanting to restore Trump to the ballot, didn’t address the underlying question of if he incited an insurrection

Reason

Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson

Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Incompatibility Clause both apply to "officers under the United States" and must thus mean the same thing

Reason

"Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"

A reply to Prof. Kurt Lash's response to the brief by Profs. Akhil Amar & Vikram Amar.

Reason

Trump v. Anderson, Professor Akhil Reed Amar, and the Constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act

Professor Amar's argument renders the presidential succession acts of 1792 and 1947 unconstitutional by barring putting the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Temper of the Senate in the line of succession to the presidency

1 … 4 5 6 7

People

From analysis to the latest developments in health,
read the most diverse news in one place.

Organisations

the House of Representatives

the Colorado Supreme Court

102 stories

Colorado Supreme Court

Read news from The Economist, FT, and more,
with one subscription

Topics

Places

Fourteen days free

Download the app

One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.