In Magistrate Judge Lara Eshkenazi's opinion Monday in Mercante v. Tarzia (E.D.N.Y.), defendant's counsel (Coleman) filed an exhibit containing "wire transfer instructions to [plaintiff's counsel's] firm's bank account":
Exhibit F purports to be redacted, and a white box with the word "REDACTED" covers the bank account information. The exhibit cover page also states that the bank account information is redacted. However, Mr. Coleman failed to adequately redact and remove the sensitive financial information, as the text is accessible by copying and pasting, or by clicking and moving the white box covering the text.
The court concluded that this didn't qualify as contempt of court (based on of its failure to comply with a protective order, "which prohibits materials marked 'confidential' from being filed on the public docket"):
