Ask computer companies and they will tell you that the Supreme Court has just saved the internet and its Section 230 liability shield — “for now.’
The court Thursday ruled that Google had not aided or abetted a 2013 ISIS terrorist attack in Paris because of the perpetrators’ use of YouTube, which Google owns. It specifically shot down the allegation, upheld by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, that Google was liable because it approved of ISIS videos for advertising and then shared the proceeds with the group.
The terrorist attacks in Paris killed 130 people, including Nohemi Gonzalez, a U. S. citizen (the case was Gonzalez et al. v. Google).
The 9th Circuit had found that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act did not bar the liability claims, but the Supreme Court said it would not even consider the Section 230 claim because there seemed to be no plausible case for relief.
Section 230 is the provision of the law providing online platforms with immunity from civil liability for any third-party content that is posted, and affords them with immunity for removing content in some circumstances.
