A Short Take on Chiles v. Salazar Another religious freedom case in a free speech guise Reason · Apr 2
Documenting Denial: A Record of Rejection Faced by Gay Couples Over the past two decades, scores of business owners across the nation have sought to refuse services for same-sex weddings, an SMU Law School study finds Reason · Sep 4, 2025
Expressive Discrimination: Universities' First Amendment Right to Affirmative Action — Part 3 Continuing my serial blogging on whether private universities can use a Boy Scouts expressive association theory to have race-based affirmative action. Reason · Mar 4, 2025
Expressive Discrimination: Universities' First Amendment Right to Affirmative Action — Part 1 Maybe some universities can continue to do race-based affirmative action, even after SFFA v. Harvard. Reason · Feb 28, 2025
Further Thoughts on Standing and the 303 Creative v Elenis case The Court's decision in this case is likely to make a mess of standing doctrine for a long time Reason · Mar 29, 2024
District Court Judgment in 303 Creative v. Elenis (the Wedding Web Site Design Case) Following the Supreme Court's remand to the Tenth Circuit, which in turn led to the remand to district court, Chief Judge Philip Brimmer (D. Colo.) rendered the following order Tuesday: It is ORDERED that plaintiffs are the prevailing parties in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b). Plaintiffs and their… Reason · Mar 28, 2024
The First Amendment Right to Affirmative Action How private universities can use Boy Scouts v. Dale to get out from under Students for Fair Admissions Reason · Feb 23, 2024
Do Religious Schools Have a Right to Exemption from State's Pronoun Policies? From Friday's opinion by Judge Daniel D. Domenico (D. Colo.) in Darren Patterson Christian Academy v. Roy (for more on a different facet of the case and on the possible relevance, or not, of government funding, see this post): "[T]he First Amendment protects an individual's right to speak his mind… Reason · Oct 23, 2023
My Emory Law op-ed on 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis More on an important free-speech case from the recent Supreme Court Term Reason · Oct 20, 2023
Experts: SCOTUS biased toward Christians Right-wing plot to limit the freedoms of groups of Americans of whom they disapprove comes to fruition Salon · Oct 6, 2023
Supreme Court is increasingly putting Christians' First Amendment rights ahead of others' dignity and rights to equal protection When the Supreme Court ruled in 303 Creative v. Elenis in 2023 that a businessperson could not be compelled to create art that violates their religious beliefs – specifically, a wedding website for a same-sex ceremony – supporters of the decision celebrated it as a victory for freedom of religion… The Conversation · Oct 5, 2023
Are We Living Through a Standing Realignment? Recent Supreme Court cases suggest that both the left and the right are already repositioning themselves. Reason · Sep 8, 2023
What Explains the Discourse on 303 Creative? Procedure, soundbites, popular views, and more combined to create legally unfounded memes. Reason · Sep 7, 2023
Did Factual Revelations Undermine 303 Creative? Recent reporting doesn't materially undermine, and could even strengthen, the case for standing. Reason · Sep 7, 2023
Reason · Sep 6, 2023 Was There Standing in 303 Creative? The Court had ample reason to find a "credible threat" of enforcement, consistent with existing case law.
Reason · Sep 5, 2023 From Prof. Richard Re: The Remarkable Discourse on 303 Creative Is the legal left beginning to adopt a hawkish attitude toward standing?
Reason · Sep 4, 2023 Prof. Richard Re (Virginia) on "Does the Discourse on 303 Creative Portend a Standing Realignment?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ_aPtt4U8M I saw this new article by Prof. Richard Re, a leading scholar of federal courts law and my former UCLA colleague, and asked him if he would guest-blog about it; I'm delighted to say that he kindly agreed. Here's the abstract: Perhaps the most surprising feature of the last…
Reason · Aug 22, 2023 20 Years After You Can't Say That! Was Published, Feeling Vindicated by 303 Creative Twenty years ago, the Cato Institute published my book, You Can't Say That!: The Growing Threat to Civil Liberties from Antidiscrimination Laws. The basic theme of the book was that as the scope of antidiscrimination laws has expanded, these laws increasingly infringe on bedrock constitutional liberties, especially freedom of expression.…
Reason · Aug 17, 2023 N.J. Attorney General's Office Releases Guidance on 303 Creative From the N.J. Attorney General's office, Division on Civil Rights, "Guidance on the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination Following the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis," released July 26: This enforcement guidance explains how the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General and the Division on…
The Guardian - US · Jul 25, 2023 Woman in anti-LGBTQ+ supreme court case did make wedding site after all, report says Lorie Smith had argued her right to free speech regarding her opposition to same-sex marriage was ‘chilled’ by Colorado’s law
Reason · Jul 18, 2023 More on Standing in the 303 Creative Case A response to my critique of the Court's new standing jurisprudence.
The Independent UK · Jul 14, 2023 Texas judge uses anti-LGBT+ Supreme Court ruling to argue she can refuse to perform same-sex weddings Justice of the peace Dianne Hensley has been arguing with Texas to not perform same-sex weddings since 2019
Los Angeles Times · Jul 14, 2023 Robin Abcarian: How the ripple effect of the Supreme Court's 303 Creative decision could swamp civil rights Now that the legal door has been opened to anti-LGBTQ+ bigots or racists, there's just no telling how far the Supreme Court's license to discriminate will go.
Salon · Jul 13, 2023 Anti-gay Texas judge banks on SCOTUS Dianne Hensley filed a lawsuit after a state agency warned her about refusing to marry gay couples
The Texas Tribune · Jul 12, 2023 Texas judge who doesn’t want to perform gay marriage ceremonies hopes web designer’s Supreme Court case helps her fight McLennan County Justice of the Peace Dianne Hensley filed a lawsuit after a state agency warned her about refusing to marry gay couples. She hopes a recent U.S. Supreme Court case about religious freedom helps her cause.