Man Installs New Doors For His Volkswagen Golf. Then He Realizes How Badly He Miscalculated: ‘This Is Why AutoZone Employees Ask’ "How could this have happened?" Motor1 · Jul 12
Arkansas Ban on Youth Gender Transition Procedures Upheld, Including Restriction on Referrals for Such Procedures But the restriction appears to cover only referrals for illegal in-state procedures, and not referrals for legal out-of-state procedures. Reason · Aug 12, 2025
More On Unpublished Opinions And En Banc Stratagems In The Fifth Circuit For nearly four years, there was a never-ending drumbeat about how the Fifth Circuit was an existential threat to the… The post More On Unpublished Opinions And En Banc Stratagems In The Fifth Circuit appeared first on Reason.com. Reason · Mar 2, 2025
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari for Braidwood Nondelegation Claim The Court will only consider one of the issues in Braidwood Management v. Becerra Reason · Jan 13, 2025
Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Becerra v. Braidwood Management Another significant administrative law grant of certiorari (and a dog that didn't bark). Reason · Jan 10, 2025
Murder suspect featured on America’s Most Wanted spent 20 years on the run. Turns out he was working as a cop Antonio Riano, 62, pleaded not guilty on Monday in the 2004 shooting death of 25-year-old Benjamin Becarra The Independent UK · Aug 5, 2024
The Standing Analysis in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine The Court ducks the conscience theory of standing based on the government's new position, "abandons" Haven's Realty, and starts the deadpool for associational standing Reason · Jun 13, 2024
"Black Lives Mat[t]er" + "Any Life" Drawing "Not Protected by the First Amendment" in First Grade Such speech can be found to be "impermissible harassment," the court says, partly because "deference to schoolteachers is especially appropriate today, where, increasingly, what is harmful or innocent speech is in the eye of the beholder." Reason · Mar 19, 2024
Do pregnant women have a right to urgent medical care? No, according to a US court Federal judges sided with a Texas law that allows the state to push pregnant patients to the brink of death before allowing medically necessary abortion The Guardian - US · Jan 10, 2024
Robe & Gavel: SCOTUS begins first week of December 2023 sitting Welcome to the Nov. 27 edition of Robe & Gavel, Ballotpedia’s newsletter about the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and other judicial happenings around the U.S. Ballotpedia · Nov 27, 2023
PrEP ruling will increase HIV spread "Entirely preventable": experts warn of a predictable public health crisis from making PrEP less accessible Salon · Apr 5, 2023
Title IX and Affordable Care Act Don't Forbid Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination So held Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk (N.D. Tex.) Friday in Neese v. Becerra; the opinion is long, but here's an excerpt: Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act prohibits discrimination "on the basis of sex." See 42 U.S.C. § 18116(a) (incorporating, among other things, Title IX's prohibition of discrimination "on the… Reason · Nov 15, 2022
Editorial: Court was wrong to oppose HIV drug mandate because of employer’s religion Religious liberty and pluralism are democratic principles that sometimes clash and that our nation must balance. We think that a federal district court in Fort Worth got that balance wrong and imperiled health care access with its recent ruling in Braidwood Management v. Becerra. In that case, the court found… Tribune News Service · Sep 15, 2022
Preventive care such as birth control, anti-HIV medicine challenged in Texas lawsuit Some object to paying for health insurance plans that cover preventive services that they say violate their religious beliefs, which could cause millions to lose access to care if the courts agree. WEKU · Aug 9, 2022
Reason · Jul 27, 2022 Kelley v. Becerra, the Preventive Care Mandate and the Major Questions Doctrine SCOTUS dodged this issue in Little Sisters of the Poor, but W.V. v. EPA invigorated the claim.
Reason · Jul 13, 2022 The Value of Parentheticals in Statutes and the Constitution Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation presents an exceedingly intricate case about Medicare funding. I won't even try to explain the facts. In dissent, Justice Kavanaugh said the statutory formula is "mind-numbingly complex." Justice Kagan, for the majority, joked "you might be ready to absorb the relevant statutory language (but don't…
Ballotpedia · Mar 22, 2022 Disclosure Digest: An overview of the arguments on donor disclosure and privacy Welcome to The Disclosure Digest! Keep an eye out for new editions published on Tuesdays through June 2022.