Counting to Five in Texas v. United States Justice Kavanaugh penned a narrow decision that cobbled together a majority. Reason · Jun 25, 2023
Making Sense of Arizona v. Navajo Nation Justice Gorsuch's conservative colleagues now ignore him in Indian cases. Reason · Jun 23, 2023
Roaming Polansky and the Constitutionality of Qui Tam Three decades later, the George H.W. Bush SCOTUS strategy finally has three votes. Reason · Jun 20, 2023
The Kavanaugh Concurrence When He Swings Left I'm holding my breath on his predictions in Allen and Brackeen. Reason · Jun 19, 2023
‘Historic and significant’: key lawyer’s verdict on Alabama supreme court ruling Deuel Ross, who argued the voting rights case Allen v Milligan before the court, discusses the significance of the 5-4 decision The Guardian - US · Jun 18, 2023
Has Justice Gorsuch Ever Written An Opinion That Ruled Against An Indian Tribe or Member? 9-0. Reason · Jun 15, 2023
Roberts Waves the White Flag of Textualism in Allen v. Milligan Justice Scalia would be rolling over in his grave. Reason · Jun 12, 2023
Justice Kavanaugh's "Principal Concurrences" On the Supreme Court, there is a hierarchy for listing opinions. The majority opinion always comes first. When the Court is fractured, and there is no clear majority, the opinion with the most support is usually listed first. When the case is an absolute cluster, sometimes the opinion by the… Reason · May 26, 2023
In Sackett v. EPA, the Supreme Court Cuts Back Federal Regulatory Authority Over Wetlands The Clean Water Act decision was a unanimous win for the Sacketts, and a 5-4 victory for Justice Scalia's 2006 Rapanos v. United States plurality. Reason · May 25, 2023
Another Voting Paradox Case (Pork Division) The California Pork case (NPCC v. Ross) is another example of a case whose outcome conflicts with the doctrines adopted by the Court itself in its opinions. Reason · May 16, 2023
Justice Kavanaugh Still Wants to Hear More Cases (Revised) Justice Kavanaugh continues to support granting certiorari in cases his colleagues do not wish to hear. Reason · May 15, 2023
How Did Justice Gorsuch Lose A Majority In National Pork Producers? Thomas assigned the majority to Justice Gorsuch, but he couldn't hold five all the way. Reason · May 12, 2023
SCOTUS Chooses California Over Pork Producers and Bacon Consumers (and Issues Four Other Opinions Too) The Supreme Court issues five merits opinions, but there are still forty more waiting. Reason · May 11, 2023
Jeff Rosen and Joan Biskupic Talk About Supreme Court Leaks RBG told Rosen that AMK wrote the Bush v. Gore PC, and Biskupic said a Justice likely leaked Dobbs wrangling to WSJ. Reason · May 5, 2023
Reason · Apr 25, 2023 Justice Kavanaugh Wants to Hear More Cases Justice Kavanaugh was alone in noting his desire to accept certiorari in two cases the justices rejected.
Reason · Apr 21, 2023 Chief Justice Roberts's Assignment Dilemma If Justices Thomas and Alito are dissent, and Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett vote with the progressives, the Chief may join the majority to avoid having Justice Sotomayor make the assignment.
Reason · Apr 20, 2023 Reed v. Goertz, California v. Texas, and WWH v. Jackson Justice Kavanaugh's six-page majority opinion does not withstand scrutiny against Justice Thomas's 20-page dissent.
Reason · Mar 28, 2023 Do Court-Appointed Prosecutors Violate The Separation of Powers? Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh argue they do, in defense of--checks notes--Steven Donziger.
Reason · Mar 12, 2023 Deep in the Heart of Amarillo Back in the day, most local newspapers hired reporters who covered the dealings in local courts. Alas, with budget cuts, those positions have gone by the wayside. It is very rare indeed for the national media to care at all what happens in small-town courts. Of course, the single-judge divisions…
Reason · Mar 1, 2023 Making Sense Of The Votes In Bittner v. United States Why did Justices Kagan and Sotomayor, but not Justice Jackson, join Justice Barrett's dissent?
Reason · Feb 28, 2023 An Unusual Supreme Court Split in Bittner v. United States The Bank Secrecy Act divides the justices in an unusual way, and Justice Barrett authors her fourth opinion in an argued case.
Reason · Feb 27, 2023 Why Big Tech will lose its Supreme Court case on section 230 I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech's sweeping immunity claims
Reason · Feb 25, 2023 Justice Kagan Double-Helixes Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh Kagan: "Kavanaugh, J. (recognizing that the argument may be forfeited, but opining on it anyway)."
Reason · Feb 20, 2023 WaPo Columnist Says The Quiet Part Out Loud About Attacks On The Judiciary "A sustained campaign of condemnation isn’t going to push these judges to write liberal opinions, but it could chasten them toward more moderate ones."